.png){kind=logo}
Keyword difficulty scores serve as crucial metrics for SEO professionals when planning content strategies and determining which keywords to target. These scores help estimate how challenging it will be to rank on the first page of search results for specific keywords. Two leading SEO tools, Semrush and Ahrefs, offer different approaches to calculating keyword difficulty, each with distinct methodologies and benefits.
Keyword difficulty represents the estimated effort required to rank on the first page of search engine results for a particular keyword. Higher difficulty scores indicate greater competition and more challenging ranking opportunities, while lower scores suggest easier targets for content optimization. Understanding these metrics helps content creators and SEO professionals make informed decisions about which keywords to prioritize in their strategies.
Several factors influence keyword difficulty calculations across different platforms. The number of referring domains pointing to top-ranking pages plays a significant role in determining competition levels. Domain authority of ranking websites also affects difficulty scores, as established sites with strong backlink profiles typically hold competitive advantages. Content quality and relevance remain essential factors, along with the backlink profiles of currently ranking pages.
Search intent alignment has become increasingly important in modern keyword difficulty assessments. Both Semrush and Ahrefs now incorporate search intent analysis into their keyword research tools, though not directly into difficulty calculations. This evolution reflects search engines' growing sophistication in understanding user needs and matching content accordingly.
Search engines analyze multiple signals when determining which pages deserve top rankings for specific keywords. The strength of backlink profiles continues to influence rankings significantly, with both the quantity and quality of referring domains playing crucial roles. However, modern algorithms also consider content depth, user engagement metrics, and technical SEO factors when evaluating page authority.
SERP features present additional complexity in keyword difficulty assessments. Featured snippets, knowledge panels, and other rich results can dramatically impact organic click-through rates, even for top-ranking pages. These features effectively reduce the available organic real estate, making competition more intense for remaining positions.
The competitive landscape varies significantly across different industries and keyword types. Long-tail keywords typically face less competition than broad, high-volume terms, making them attractive targets for newer websites or those with limited domain authority. Understanding these nuances helps content creators develop more realistic expectations and strategic approaches.
Semrush employs a comprehensive methodology that considers multiple ranking factors when calculating keyword difficulty scores. The platform uses a percentage scale from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater difficulty levels. This approach aims to provide a holistic view of ranking challenges by incorporating various competitive elements into a single metric.
The Semrush algorithm analyzes several key components when determining difficulty scores:
Semrush's calculation process begins by analyzing the top 10 ranking pages for any given keyword. The platform examines the median values of referring domains, follow/nofollow link ratios, and overall Authority Scores of competing domains. This median-based approach helps avoid inflated difficulty scores that might discourage content creators from targeting valuable keywords.
The multi-factor methodology used by Semrush provides several advantages for SEO professionals. By considering SERP features in difficulty calculations, the platform offers more accurate representations of actual ranking landscapes. This inclusion helps content creators understand the full competitive environment, including non-traditional organic results that might impact visibility.
Semrush also offers personalized keyword difficulty scores that factor in your domain's authority and topical relevance. This feature provides more accurate assessments of your specific chances of ranking for particular keywords, rather than generic difficulty scores that don't account for your site's strengths. The personalized approach enables more strategic keyword targeting and resource allocation.
However, the comprehensive nature of Semrush's approach can sometimes lead to scores that seem higher than expected, particularly for newer websites. The multifaceted calculation method may overwhelm users who prefer simpler, more actionable metrics. Additionally, the exact weighting of different factors in the algorithm remains proprietary, limiting transparency in understanding how scores are derived.
Ahrefs takes a more streamlined approach to keyword difficulty calculation, focusing primarily on backlink profiles of top-ranking pages. The platform uses a 0-100 scale similar to Semrush but bases its calculations on a single primary factor: the estimated number of referring domains needed to rank in the top 10 for a given keyword. This methodology stems from Ahrefs' research showing strong correlations between referring domains and search rankings.
The Ahrefs calculation process follows a straightforward methodology. The platform analyzes backlink profiles of the top 10 ranking pages for each keyword, calculates a weighted average of referring domains to these pages, and plots this average on a logarithmic curve to determine the final difficulty score. This approach provides direct, actionable insights for link-building strategies.
Ahrefs' keyword difficulty scores correspond to specific referring domain requirements. Keywords with difficulty scores between 0-30 typically require fewer than 10 referring domains, while scores above 70 may require 100 or more referring domains to achieve top 10 rankings. This clear correlation makes it easier for SEO professionals to set realistic link-building goals and timelines.
The single-factor approach used by Ahrefs offers several practical advantages for content creators and SEO professionals. The simplicity makes difficulty scores easier to interpret and act upon, providing clear guidance for link-building efforts. When you see a keyword difficulty score of 50 in Ahrefs, you immediately understand the approximate number of referring domains needed to compete effectively.
Consistency represents another strength of Ahrefs' methodology. By focusing primarily on backlinks, the platform delivers more consistent scores across different keywords and niches. This consistency helps users develop standardized approaches to keyword evaluation and campaign planning across various content topics.
The actionable nature of Ahrefs' difficulty scores enables direct strategic planning. Knowing the estimated number of backlinks required provides concrete goals for outreach campaigns and partnership development. Content creators can more easily assess whether they have the resources and timeline necessary to compete for specific keywords.
However, this simplified approach also presents certain limitations. By focusing primarily on backlinks, other important ranking factors may receive insufficient consideration. Content quality, user experience signals, and technical SEO elements all influence rankings but aren't directly reflected in Ahrefs' difficulty calculations. This narrow focus might lead to oversimplified assessments in some competitive landscapes.
Significant differences often appear when comparing keyword difficulty scores between Semrush and Ahrefs for identical keywords. These discrepancies result from their fundamentally different calculation methodologies and the factors each platform prioritizes. Understanding these differences helps SEO professionals interpret scores appropriately and avoid confusion when using multiple tools.
A keyword might receive a difficulty score of 65% in Semrush while showing only 35 in Ahrefs for the same search term. These variations highlight the importance of understanding each tool's methodology rather than treating difficulty scores as universal standards. Ahrefs might classify a keyword as "easy" (0-30 range) while Semrush rates the same term as "medium" difficulty (40-60% range).
The calculation differences stem from each platform's core philosophy about ranking factors. Semrush's comprehensive approach considers multiple variables that might affect ranking success, while Ahrefs focuses specifically on backlink requirements. Neither approach is inherently superior; they simply provide different perspectives on competitive landscapes.
When working with multiple SEO tools, consistency in platform usage becomes crucial for meaningful comparisons. Comparing difficulty scores within the same tool provides more valuable insights than cross-platform comparisons. This approach ensures you're working with consistent methodologies and can track changes over time using standardized metrics.
Context plays a vital role in interpreting difficulty scores from either platform. A high difficulty score might represent an insurmountable challenge for a new website but could be achievable for an established domain with strong existing backlink profiles. Your website's current authority, topical relevance, and available resources should all factor into keyword targeting decisions.
The competitive analysis capabilities of both platforms extend beyond simple difficulty scores. Examining the actual top-ranking pages provides insights into content quality, user experience factors, and technical optimization levels that difficulty scores alone cannot capture. This deeper analysis helps identify opportunities that might not be apparent from numerical scores alone.
Effective use of keyword difficulty scores requires treating them as guides rather than absolute rules. These metrics work best when combined with other important factors like search volume, click-through rates, and content relevance to your audience. Balancing difficulty with opportunity often yields better results than simply targeting the easiest keywords available.
Website authority significantly impacts how difficulty scores should be interpreted and applied. Established domains with strong backlink profiles can often compete for higher difficulty keywords that would be unrealistic targets for newer sites. Understanding your domain's competitive position helps set appropriate expectations and timelines for ranking achievements.
The following strategic considerations enhance keyword difficulty utilization:
Content planning benefits significantly from incorporating keyword difficulty analysis into broader strategic frameworks. Rather than focusing solely on easy-to-rank keywords, successful strategies often include a mix of difficulty levels that align with different content goals and timelines. This balanced approach enables both quick wins and long-term competitive positioning.
Keyword clustering techniques work well alongside difficulty analysis to identify content opportunities that address multiple related search terms. Grouping keywords by topic and difficulty level helps prioritize content creation efforts and resource allocation. This approach often reveals opportunities to target multiple keywords within single pieces of comprehensive content.
Long-term content strategies should account for evolving keyword difficulty over time. As your domain authority grows and your content library expands, previously challenging keywords may become more accessible targets. Regular reassessment of keyword portfolios ensures your strategy adapts to changing competitive landscapes and improved domain strength.
Search intent has become increasingly important in modern keyword analysis, though it doesn't directly impact difficulty calculations in most tools. Understanding whether users seek informational content, product comparisons, or transactional opportunities helps ensure your content aligns with searcher expectations. This alignment often matters more for ranking success than raw difficulty scores suggest.
SERP feature presence significantly impacts keyword targeting decisions beyond traditional difficulty considerations. Featured snippets, image packs, and local results can dramatically reduce organic click-through rates even for top-ranking positions. Analyzing these features helps set realistic traffic expectations and identify alternative optimization opportunities.
Local SEO considerations add another layer of complexity to keyword difficulty analysis. Semrush offers more robust local SEO features, including location-specific keyword metrics that can reveal opportunities in geographic markets. These localized insights often show lower competition levels than national keyword data suggests.
Historical keyword data provides valuable context for difficulty score interpretation and strategic planning. Semrush's historical data extends back to 2012, while Ahrefs covers trends from 2015 onward. This historical perspective helps identify seasonal patterns, competitive changes, and long-term opportunity trends that current difficulty scores alone cannot reveal.
Trend analysis becomes particularly valuable when planning content calendars and resource allocation. Keywords showing declining difficulty over time might indicate emerging opportunities, while increasing difficulty could signal growing competition that requires adjusted strategies. These patterns help inform both short-term tactical decisions and long-term strategic planning.
Competitive intelligence gathered through historical analysis often reveals strategic insights about competitor content strategies and market positioning. Understanding how difficulty scores have changed for key industry terms provides context for your own competitive positioning and helps identify potential market gaps or emerging opportunities.
Successful keyword strategies require balancing multiple factors beyond difficulty scores alone. Search volume, commercial intent, content creation resources, and competitive positioning all influence which keywords deserve priority in your content planning. The most effective approaches often target a diverse portfolio of keywords across different difficulty levels and search intents.
Content quality remains the ultimate determining factor in ranking success, regardless of keyword difficulty scores. High-quality, comprehensive content that genuinely serves user needs can often outperform technically superior competitors. Focus on creating valuable resources that address your audience's questions and challenges while naturally incorporating targeted keywords.
Regular monitoring and adjustment of keyword strategies ensures continued effectiveness as competitive landscapes evolve. Difficulty scores change over time as new competitors enter markets and existing players strengthen their positions. Staying responsive to these changes helps maintain competitive advantages and identify new opportunities as they emerge.
Your keyword difficulty analysis should integrate seamlessly with broader content marketing and business objectives rather than operating in isolation. The most valuable keywords for your business might not always be the easiest to rank for, but they could provide the highest conversion potential or strategic value. Balancing SEO considerations with business goals creates more sustainable and profitable content strategies that serve both search engines and your target audience effectively.