.png){kind=logo}
SEO professionals constantly face the challenge of selecting the right keywords to target, and understanding keyword difficulty metrics becomes essential for making informed decisions. Two industry-leading tools, Semrush and Ahrefs, offer different approaches to measuring how challenging it is to rank for specific keywords. These platforms use distinct methodologies that can result in significantly different difficulty scores for the same keyword, making it crucial to understand their underlying calculations.
Keyword difficulty represents the estimated effort required to achieve top rankings for a specific search term in organic results. This metric helps content creators and SEO specialists prioritize their efforts by identifying opportunities where they can realistically compete. Both Semrush and Ahrefs express keyword difficulty on a 0-100 scale, but their calculation methods differ substantially.
Semrush presents keyword difficulty as a percentage, where higher values indicate greater competition. Their algorithm evaluates multiple ranking factors including backlink profiles, domain authority, content quality, and search volume patterns. This comprehensive approach aims to provide a holistic view of the competitive landscape for any given keyword.
Semrush employs a multi-factor algorithm that considers several key elements when determining keyword difficulty. The platform analyzes the backlink profiles of top-ranking pages, examining both the quantity and quality of referring domains. Domain authority scores play a significant role, as pages from high-authority websites typically require more effort to outrank.
Content quality assessment forms another crucial component of Semrush's methodology. The platform evaluates the relevance, depth, and optimization level of existing content ranking for target keywords. Search volume data also influences difficulty scores, as keywords with higher search volumes often face increased competition from established websites.
The tool incorporates word count analysis, recognizing that longer, more specific keyword phrases typically encounter less competition. This feature proves particularly valuable for identifying long-tail keyword opportunities that newer websites can realistically target without massive backlink campaigns.
Ahrefs focuses primarily on backlink analysis when calculating keyword difficulty scores. Their methodology centers on counting the number of referring domains pointing to the top 10 ranking pages for any given keyword. This streamlined approach provides clear, actionable insights about the link-building requirements for achieving competitive rankings.
The platform's algorithm establishes correlations between referring domain counts and ranking positions. For example, a keyword difficulty score of 40 might indicate that approximately 56 referring domains are needed to break into the top 10 results. This direct relationship makes it easier for SEO professionals to estimate the resources required for ranking success.
Ahrefs deliberately excludes on-page optimization factors from their difficulty calculations. While this approach simplifies the metric, it may overlook important elements like content quality, user experience signals, and technical SEO factors that influence rankings. The tool compensates for this limitation by providing separate metrics for analyzing these additional ranking factors.
Users frequently encounter significant discrepancies when comparing keyword difficulty scores between Semrush and Ahrefs for identical keywords. These variations stem from their fundamentally different calculation methodologies and the ranking factors each platform prioritizes.
Semrush's comprehensive approach often produces higher difficulty scores because it considers multiple competitive factors beyond just backlinks. Keywords that appear moderately difficult in Ahrefs might receive much higher scores in Semrush due to strong domain authority among ranking pages or high-quality content optimization. This difference becomes particularly pronounced for competitive commercial keywords where established brands dominate search results.
Ahrefs' backlink-focused methodology can sometimes underestimate keyword difficulty when other ranking factors play significant roles. Keywords with moderate backlink requirements might still prove challenging to rank for if they require extensive content optimization, technical improvements, or strong user engagement signals. However, this approach excels at identifying opportunities where strategic link building can drive ranking improvements.
Different industries and keyword types exhibit varying levels of discrepancy between these platforms. Local business keywords often show smaller gaps because backlink profiles tend to be less developed in local markets. E-commerce and highly competitive commercial terms typically display larger variations due to the complex interplay of multiple ranking factors.
Long-tail keywords frequently receive lower difficulty scores in both platforms, but Semrush may show even more favorable ratings due to its consideration of search volume and content specificity. These keywords often present excellent opportunities for newer websites to establish topical authority before targeting more competitive head terms.
Technical and niche industry keywords sometimes confuse automated difficulty calculations because they require specialized expertise rather than just strong backlink profiles. Semrush's content quality assessment may better capture these nuances, while Ahrefs might underestimate the expertise requirements for ranking in specialized fields.
Selecting between Semrush and Ahrefs for keyword difficulty analysis depends largely on your specific SEO approach and resource availability. Content-focused strategies benefit from Semrush's comprehensive evaluation of ranking factors, while link-building campaigns align well with Ahrefs' backlink-centric methodology.
Newer websites with limited domain authority often find Ahrefs' straightforward backlink analysis more actionable for planning their growth strategies. The platform clearly indicates the link-building requirements for achieving competitive rankings, making it easier to develop realistic timelines and resource allocation plans. Semrush's multi-factor approach might overwhelm beginners with too many variables to consider simultaneously.
Established websites with strong domain authority may prefer Semrush's nuanced analysis that considers content quality and optimization opportunities. These sites can often compete for keywords through superior content creation and technical optimization, even when facing stronger backlink profiles from competitors.
Both platforms offer different pricing tiers that affect access to keyword difficulty data and related features. Semrush provides personalized keyword difficulty scores that account for your specific domain authority, offering more tailored insights for strategic planning. This feature proves particularly valuable for agencies managing multiple client accounts with varying authority levels.
Ahrefs excels in backlink analysis capabilities, providing detailed insights into competitor link profiles that inform outreach strategies. Their keyword difficulty metric integrates seamlessly with comprehensive backlink research tools, creating a cohesive workflow for link-building campaigns. The platform's traffic potential metric also helps identify keywords where featured snippets or other SERP features might impact click-through rates.
Database coverage varies between platforms, with each tool showing strengths in different geographic markets and languages. Semrush typically provides more comprehensive coverage for international markets, while Ahrefs often delivers more accurate data for English-language keywords in competitive markets.
Experienced SEO professionals often combine insights from both platforms to develop more accurate keyword difficulty assessments. Cross-referencing scores helps identify potential opportunities that might be overlooked when relying on a single tool's methodology. Keywords showing low difficulty in one platform but high difficulty in another deserve closer manual analysis.
Manual SERP analysis remains crucial for validating automated difficulty scores from either platform. Examining the actual search results reveals important context about ranking pages, including their content quality, user engagement signals, and optimization levels. This analysis often uncovers opportunities that automated tools might miss or overestimate.
Tracking keyword difficulty changes over time provides valuable insights into market dynamics and competitive trends. Both platforms offer historical data that helps identify seasonal fluctuations, emerging competitors, and shifting search behaviors that affect ranking difficulty. This longitudinal analysis proves essential for long-term SEO planning and strategy adjustment.
Successful keyword research extends beyond difficulty scores to include search volume trends, click-through rate potential, and commercial intent indicators. Semrush's keyword magic tool provides comprehensive data about related terms and search variations, while Ahrefs' keywords explorer offers detailed SERP analysis and traffic potential estimates.
Content gap analysis using either platform helps identify keyword opportunities that competitors might be missing. These gaps often represent lower-difficulty targets that can drive significant traffic growth when properly optimized. Both tools provide features for comparing keyword portfolios across multiple competitors simultaneously.
User intent analysis becomes increasingly important as search engines prioritize relevance over traditional ranking factors. Understanding whether searchers seek informational, commercial, or navigational content helps predict ranking difficulty more accurately than automated scores alone. Both platforms provide SERP feature data that indicates the types of content Google favors for specific keywords.
Effective keyword research requires understanding the strengths and limitations of both Semrush and Ahrefs while developing strategies that leverage their unique capabilities. Rather than viewing these tools as competitors, successful SEO professionals treat them as complementary resources that provide different perspectives on keyword opportunities. The key lies in understanding when each platform's methodology aligns best with your specific goals and competitive situation.
Start by identifying your primary SEO objectives and resource constraints before selecting your primary keyword research platform. Consider supplementing your chosen tool with occasional cross-references from the alternative platform, particularly for high-value keywords that will receive significant optimization investment. This balanced approach helps minimize the risk of pursuing keywords that prove more difficult than initially estimated while maximizing your chances of identifying genuine opportunities in competitive markets.